A visual guide to the 19 defendants in the Trump Georgia case

Former President Donald Trump was arrested August 24 in Fulton County, Georgia, on costs associated to his makes an attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

The Georgia costs come from the most important of the 4 critical prison circumstances Trump faces; one among a number of distinctive issues about Trump’s Georgia indictment is the variety of defendants who’re named in it. Whereas the US authorities’s January 6 case towards Trump largely focuses on the previous president, Fulton County District Legal professional Fani Willis is pursuing a case not solely towards Trump, however 18 further defendants who had been attorneys, staffers, and native officers allegedly working with the previous president.

Willis charged such a big group as a result of she argues that the Trump marketing campaign was on the heart of a prison enterprise and that most of the people named within the case helped help within the group’s try to overturn the Georgia 2020 election outcomes.

Establishing that Trump and his allies had been a part of an enterprise — an individual, group, or enterprise engaged in authorized or unlawful habits — is vital to Willis’s assertion that the defendants violated Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. To take action, prosecutors might want to persuade a jury that every one the defendants are responsible of racketeering, or organizing an enterprise to systematically plan and commit crimes, and utilizing coercion, manipulation, and intimidation as wanted to advance their objectives.

The record of individuals Willis says had been a part of that enterprise is loads to maintain observe of, and contains high-profile acquainted faces — corresponding to former Trump legal professional Rudy Giuliani and former White Home Chief of Workers Mark Meadows — in addition to less-well-known people like false electors David Shafer and Shawn Nonetheless.

Under, now we have a visible information of the 19 defendants’ mugshots, the costs they face, and their connection to this indictment. (Some mugshots have but to be launched and will likely be added when they’re. Defendants have till Friday, August 25, at midday to show themselves in to Georgia officers.)

Former President Donald Trump

Position: Former president and charged as head of the prison enterprise

Costs: 13, together with racketeering, soliciting a public official to violate their oath of workplace, and making false statements

Connection to the case: The indictment describes Trump because the chief of the prison enterprise that sought to overturn the 2020 Georgia election outcomes.

Amongst different issues, it accuses him of planning, alongside allies, of deceptive the general public in regards to the election in speeches, repeatedly mendacity to elected officers in key states to get them to again his push to overturn the election, pressuring many officers to tamper with the electoral course of, working to disrupt Congress’s certification of the electoral vote, and utilizing social media to foment conspiracy theories.

It additionally claims that Trump knew he had not gained the election and that the actions his allies undertook to overturn it had been completed with Trump’s implicit, and sometimes express, approval.

Trump’s post-election authorized crew

Rudy Giuliani

Position: Former Trump legal professional

Costs: 13, together with racketeering, making false statements, and conspiracy to commit forgery

Connection to the case: Giuliani, previously New York Metropolis’s mayor, turned a detailed Trump ally over the course of the previous president’s administration, and ultimately served as Trump’s private lawyer. He was a outstanding determine within the days following the election, appearing on television and holding press conferences falsely arguing Trump gained.

He’s accused of pressuring legislatures in a number of states, together with Georgia, to call electors that will award the election to Trump regardless that a number of recounts had confirmed his loss.

John Eastman

Position: Former Trump legal professional

Costs: 9, together with racketeering, solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer, and submitting false paperwork

Connection to the case: Eastman is a longtime fixture within the conservative authorized scene and was previously the chair of the Federalist Society. He started advising Trump in earnest following the 2020 election and composed a memo that was central to the previous President’s efforts to strain Vice President Mike Pence to reject the 2020 election outcomes.

The indictment accuses Eastman of working with Trump to coordinate another slate of electors in a number of states and of submitting false paperwork that allege unfounded claims of election fraud in Georgia, together with that hundreds of felons and underaged individuals voted illegally.

Sidney Powell

Position: Former Trump legal professional

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit election fraud, and conspiracy to defraud the state

Connection to the case: Powell was a Trump marketing campaign legal professional who turned probably the most seen faces of the hassle touting unfounded election fraud claims, famously saying at one level that she would “launch the Kraken” of proof. Powell additionally vocally unfold lies about how Dominion voting machines favored Biden versus Trump, an allegation that later performed a job within the defamation lawsuit Dominion filed towards Fox News.

The indictment accuses Powell of hiring a forensic information agency to accumulate information from Dominion voting machines throughout the nation, together with in Espresso County, Georgia. It additionally alleges that Powell tampered with digital poll markers and machines in Espresso County.

Kenneth Chesebro

Position: Former Trump legal professional

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit forgery, and conspiracy to commit submitting false paperwork

Connection to the case: Chesebro, a lawyer who has labored with conservatives lately, is without doubt one of the lesser-known Trump attorneys who performed a significant function in advancing the thought of the faux electors scheme. As a part of his argument, Cheseboro advised that a number of states may have false electors put forth votes for Trump and ship them to Washington, sowing doubt round Biden’s win.

The indictment accuses him of a number of offenses, together with conspiracy to commit submitting false paperwork by submitting a doc in regards to the Georgia electors in courtroom that contained false statements. His memos allegedly helped gas the plan to safe a slate of other electors in every state that may very well be despatched to Congress to trigger confusion and mistrust.

Jenna Ellis

Position: Former Trump legal professional

Connection to the case: Ellis is a conservative lawyer and a former deputy district legal professional from Colorado. Ellis allegedly coordinated Georgia hearings that helped perpetuate unfounded claims of election fraud and is alleged to have participated in conferences and hearings associated to overturning the vote in different key states as effectively.

The indictment accuses her of writing memos making the authorized case {that a} vp can intercede in the course of the congressional session meant to certify the electoral vote and may cease that vote from taking place. These memos supposedly helped kind the premise of the strain marketing campaign Trump publicly waged to attempt to get his vp, Mike Pence, to assist overturn the election.

Ray Smith

Position: Former Trump 2020 marketing campaign legal professional in Georgia

Costs: 12, together with racketeering, solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer, and false statements

Connection to the case: Smith was beforehand a staffer within the Georgia Legal professional Normal’s workplace and served as Trump’s native legal professional in Georgia in the course of the 2020 marketing campaign. Smith is called for testifying at a Georgia state Senate listening to and perpetuating election lies there, in addition to collaborating in an election problem in Georgia state courtroom. Moreover, he’s accused of pressuring Georgia Home members to nominate various electors.

Authorities and marketing campaign officers

Mark Meadows

Position: former White Home chief of employees

Costs: two, together with racketeering and solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer

Connection to the case: Meadows was Trump’s fourth (should you rely performing chief Mick Mulvaney) and closing chief of employees and was a key member of his inner circle in the final days of his administration. In all the January 6 investigations, there have been many questions on how a lot Meadows knew about Trump’s way of thinking throughout his makes an attempt to overturn the election.

The indictment principally casts him as a facilitator, allegedly serving to coordinate communications between Trump and Georgia election officers, coordinating authorized methods, and spreading false theories about election fraud.

Jeffrey Clark

Position: former performing assistant legal professional basic on the DOJ

Costs: two, together with racketeering and try to commit false statements and writings

Connection to the case: Clark turned identified in the course of the January 6 investigation as a DOJ official mentioned to have tried to make use of the chaos unfolding on the finish of the Trump administration to catapult himself into the function of performing legal professional basic, after which, to make use of the ability of that workplace to drive key states to acknowledge Trump’s false electors, handing the election to Trump.

The indictment particulars Clark’s communications with performing legal professional basic Jeffrey Rosen and different key officers, together with a false letter meant for Georgia officers that advised the DOJ had noticed considerations with the state’s election outcomes that would have required the reevaluation of the result and the appointment of latest electors. It means that he was a key a part of the hassle to make use of the federal government as a device to overturn the election.

Michael Roman

Position: Senior Trump marketing campaign staffer

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer, and conspiracy to commit forgery

Connection to the case: Roman had a low-profile function within the Trump marketing campaign as its director of Election Day operations. That job required coordination with native election officers, lawmakers, and marketing campaign members. The indictment suggests Roman used contacts made in the course of the marketing campaign to assist coordinate the plan to arrange a slate of faux electors and alleges that he offered organizational help for that plan in Georgia, together with organising conferences.

Misty Hampton

Position: Former Espresso County, Georgia, election supervisor

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit election fraud, and conspiracy to defraud the state

Connection to the case: Within the weeks after the election, Hampton publicly questioned the outcomes of the election and superior the conspiracy concept that there was one thing amiss with Dominion Voting Techniques machines, together with by posting a video in style among the many proper meant to indicate that the machines may simply be tampered with. She told the Washington Post she allowed businessman Scott Corridor, one of many different defendants, and others entry to the Espresso County elections workplace to assist show to the world “that this election was not completed true and proper.”

The indictment accuses her of improperly accessing and sharing the Espresso County machine’s information and of aiding Trump supporters who had been making an attempt to get information.

Native operators and Trump supporters

Robert Cheeley

Position: trial legal professional in Georgia

Costs: 10, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer, and conspiracy to commit false statements

Connection to the case: Cheeley is a neighborhood lawyer who represented Trump, a faux elector, and different GOP figures. He’s greatest identified for testifying at a Georgia legislative listening to making false allegations of miscounting and election fraud, together with beneath oath.

Scott Corridor

Position: Atlanta-based Trump supporter

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit election fraud, and conspiracy to defraud the state

Connection to the case: Corridor is a neighborhood bail bondsman and Trump supporter. Hampton told the Washington Post that he and others visited Espresso County’s election places of work however that she wasn’t certain precisely how they spent their time there, telling the paper, “I’m not a babysitter.” The indictment alleges he illegally accessed information from a voting machine in Espresso County, Georgia.

Stephen Lee

Position: Illinois pastor and Trump supporter

Costs: 5, together with racketeering, making an attempt to affect witnesses, and conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings

Connection to the case: Earlier than the 2020 election, Lee was a touring pastor who specialised in ministering to regulation enforcement post-crisis. A Trump supporter, he went to the house of election employee Ruby Freeman, whom pro-Trump conspiracy theorists accused of serving to to illegally swing the election for Biden.

When the police got here to the home, Lee told them, “I’m a pastor and I’m additionally working with some people who’re making an attempt to assist Ruby out and in addition get to some fact of what’s occurring.” He went on to attach with codefendant Harrison Floyd, asking for his help in speaking to Freeman, reportedly believing that Freeman, a Black lady, would reply extra positively to Floyd, a Black man.

Lee’s efforts, the indictment claims, represent intimidation of Atlanta election officers and unlawful influencing of witnesses.

Harrison Floyd

Position: former chief of Black Voters for Trump

Costs: three, together with racketeering, conspiracy to decide to false writings, and conspiracy to affect witnesses

Connection to the case: Floyd had lengthy been a Trump supporter however turned concerned with the opposite defendants after responding to a name from Lee. He then reportedly recruited defendant Trevian Kutti’s help in making an attempt to speak to Ruby Freeman, the Atlanta election employee pro-Trump forces accused of fraud. The indictment claims he participated in an intimidation scheme.

Trevian Kutti

Position: Trump supporter and former publicist for celebrities like Kanye West

Costs: three, together with racketeering, conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements, and conspiracy to affect witnesses

Connection to the case: Kutti traveled from her base of operations in Chicago to Atlanta after talking with Floyd. As soon as there, she reportedly went to Freeman’s home, advised her she’d been despatched by an unnamed “high-profile particular person,” and gave Freeman an ultimatum: Confess to election crimes or go to jail. Freeman known as the police and was in the end advised by the FBI to relocate for her personal security.

Kutti, like Floyd and Lee, is now accused of being concerned in Freeman’s intimidation and of influencing a witness.

False electors

David Shafer

Position: Georgia false elector and former chair of the state’s Republican Social gathering

Costs: eight, together with racketeering, impersonating a public officer, and forgery

Connection to the case: Shafer allegedly helped coordinate the false elector scheme within the state and signed paperwork suggesting that he was one among 16 certified electors declaring Trump’s victory. Based on the indictment, he requested the faux electors to quietly collect on the Georgia state Capitol on December 14, 2020, to “keep away from drawing consideration to what we’re doing.” He then signed a letter to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp asking him to approve the faux slate of electors.

Shafer has requested that the case towards him be moved to federal courtroom and has tried to pin the blame for any wrongdoing on these with extra energy and affect: “Mr. Shafer and the opposite Republican Electors within the 2020 election acted on the course of the incumbent President and different federal officers,” Shafer’s legal professional wrote within the petition. Trump’s attorneys had argued to Shafer that assembling the faux electors was obligatory for the previous president to win Georgia’s electoral votes if he was capable of win his courtroom challenges to the outcomes, and Shafer has offered proof that he was intently coordinating with them.

Shawn Nonetheless

Position: false elector and Georgia state senator

Costs: seven, together with racketeering, impersonating a public officer, and forgery

Connection to the case: Nonetheless, the secretary of the Georgia 2020 Electoral School Assembly, was amongst 16 Republicans who signed a certificates falsely claiming that they had been “duly elected and certified” electors for the state and that Trump had gained the election. He then signed a letter to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp asking him to approve the faux slate of electors.

He has additionally requested that the case towards him be transferred to federal court as a result of he was performing on the course of Trump’s attorneys, whom he argues had been successfully brokers of the federal authorities at that time.

Cathy Latham

Position: false elector and former head of the Espresso County Republicans

Costs: eleven, together with racketeering, impersonating a public officer, and forgery

Connection to the case: Latham was amongst 16 Republicans who signed a certificates falsely claiming that they had been “duly elected and certified” electors for the state and that Trump had gained the election. Primarily based on cellphone calls and textual content messages procured by Georgia prosecutors, she was additionally charged in connection to a voting system breach in Espresso County allegedly orchestrated by Hampton and different Trump allies who sought to offer proof that the 2020 election was fraudulent.

The indictment alleges that Latham and others tampered with digital poll markers and tabulating machines and took official ballots outdoors of a polling location with out authorization.