Connect with us

Artificial Intelligence

Birders and AI push bird conservation to the next level

Published

on

[ad_1]

For the first time, big data and artificial intelligence (AI) are being used to model hidden patterns in nature, not just for one bird species, but for entire ecological communities across continents. And the models follow each species’ full annual life cycle, from breeding to fall migration to nonbreeding grounds, and back north again during spring migration. It begins with the more than 900,000 birders who report their sightings to the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s eBird program, one of the world’s largest biodiversity science projects. When combined with innovations in technology and artificial intelligence-the same innovations that power self-driving cars and real-time language translation-these sightings are revealing more than ever about patterns of bird biodiversity, and the processes that underlie them.

The development and application of this revolutionary computational tool is the result of a collaboration between the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and the Cornell Institute for Computational Sustainability. This work is now published in the journal Ecology.

“This method uniquely tells us which species occur where, when, with what other species, and under what environmental conditions,” said lead author Courtney Davis, a researcher at the Cornell Lab. “With that type of information, we can identify and prioritize landscapes of high conservation value — vital information in this era of ongoing biodiversity loss.”

“This model is very general and is suitable for various tasks, provided there’s enough data,” Gomes said. “This work on joint bird species distribution modeling is about predicting the presence and absence of species, but we are also developing models to estimate bird abundance — the number of individual birds per species. We’re also aiming to enhance the model by incorporating bird calls alongside visual observations.”

Cross-disciplinary collaborations like this are necessary for the future of biodiversity conservation, according to Daniel Fink, researcher at the Cornell Lab and senior author of the study.

“The task at hand is too big for ecologists to do on their own-we need the expertise of our colleagues in computer science and computational sustainability to develop targeted plans for landscape-scale conservation, restoration, and management around the world.”

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, The Leon Levy Foundation, The Wolf Creek Foundation, the Eric and Wendy Schmidt AI in Science Postdoctoral Fellowship — a Schmidt Future program, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

[ad_2]

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Artificial Intelligence

We do not seek to harvest data and monetise it: Worldcoin CEO

Published

on

All images and data mined by American firm Worldcoin were automatically deleted after registration, its directors told MPs yesterday.

Tool for Humanity, a firm mandated to conduct business for Worldcoin in Kenya Chief Executive Steve Blania told the lawmakers that the scanning of iris was necessary as it was the best way to distinguish individuals.

It also emerged that the Data Protection Commissioner Immaculate Kasait had revoked the licence to Worldcoin. Appearing before the Ad Hoc Committee of the National Assembly probing the firm’s operations in the country, Blania revealed that part of the data collected was stored in the blockchains in South Africa and Italy.

“We do not seek to harvest data and monetise it. The agenda is to protect privacy. Our goal is not to create an environment that identifies the user,” he told the committee.

“Images of a person’s iris are immediately deleted from the orb device. It is the nature of the AI models that we need data to train the model to distinguish people,” said company lawyer Thomas Scott.

The information contradicts Communication Authority Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Ezra Chiloba who had told the committee that the data was stored in Amazon, USA. The Ad Hoc committee is investigating whether there were any unlawful operations of the company which has been accused of mining data from Kenyans.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

A biotech company says it put dopamine-making cells into people’s brains

Published

on

[ad_1]

Authorized questions

Embryonic stem cells had been first remoted in 1998 on the College of Wisconsin from embryos made in fertility clinics. They’re helpful to scientists as a result of they are often grown within the lab and, in principle, be coaxed to type any of the 200 or so cell sorts within the human physique, prompting makes an attempt to revive imaginative and prescient, remedy diabetes, and reverse spinal twine damage. 

Nonetheless, there may be nonetheless no medical therapy primarily based on embryonic stem cells, regardless of billions of {dollars}’ price of analysis by governments and corporations over two and a half many years. BlueRock’s research stays one of many key makes an attempt to vary that. 

And stem cells proceed to lift delicate points in Germany, the place Bayer is headquartered. Below Germany’s Embryo Safety Act, probably the most restrictive such legal guidelines on this planet, it’s nonetheless a criminal offense, punishable with a jail sentence, to derive embryonic cells from an embryo.

What’s authorized, in sure circumstances, is to make use of present cell provides from overseas, as long as they had been created earlier than 2007. Seth Ettenberg, the president and CEO of BlueRock, says the corporate is manufacturing neurons within the US and that to take action it employs embryonic stem cells from the unique provides in Wisconsin, which stay extensively used.

“All of the operations of BlueRock respect the excessive moral and authorized requirements of the German Embryo Safety Act, provided that BlueRock shouldn’t be conducting any actions with human embryos,” Nuria Aiguabella Font, a Bayer spokesperson, stated in an electronic mail.

Lengthy historical past

The thought of changing dopamine-making cells to deal with Parkinson’s dates to the Eighties, when medical doctors tried it with fetal neurons collected after abortions. These research proved equivocal. Whereas some sufferers might have benefited, the experiments generated alarming headlines after others developed “nightmarish” side effects, like uncontrolled writhing and jerking.

Utilizing mind cells from fetuses wasn’t simply ethically doubtful to some. Researchers additionally grew to become satisfied such tissue was so variable and onerous to acquire that it couldn’t change into a standardized therapy. “There’s a historical past of makes an attempt to transplant cells or tissue fragments into brains,” says Henchcliffe. “None ever got here to fruition, and I believe previously there was a lack of expertise of the mechanism of motion, and an absence of enough cells of managed high quality.”

But there was proof transplanted cells might stay. Publish-mortem examinations of some sufferers who’d been handled with fetal cells confirmed that the transplants had been nonetheless current a few years later. “There are an entire bunch of individuals concerned in these fetal-cell transplants. They at all times wished to seek out out—in the event you did it proper, wouldn’t it work?” says Jeanne Loring, a cofounder of Aspen Neuroscience, a stem-cell firm planning to launch its personal checks for Parkinson’s illness.

[ad_2]

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

An ‘introspective’ AI finds diversity improves performance

Published

on

[ad_1]

A man-made intelligence with the flexibility to look inward and positive tune its personal neural community performs higher when it chooses variety over lack of variety, a brand new examine finds. The ensuing numerous neural networks had been notably efficient at fixing advanced duties.

“We created a take a look at system with a non-human intelligence, a man-made intelligence (AI), to see if the AI would select variety over the dearth of variety and if its alternative would enhance the efficiency of the AI,” says William Ditto, professor of physics at North Carolina State College, director of NC State’s Nonlinear Synthetic Intelligence Laboratory (NAIL) and co-corresponding creator of the work. “The important thing was giving the AI the flexibility to look inward and study the way it learns.”

Neural networks are a sophisticated kind of AI loosely based mostly on the best way that our brains work. Our pure neurons trade electrical impulses in line with the strengths of their connections. Synthetic neural networks create equally robust connections by adjusting numerical weights and biases throughout coaching periods. For instance, a neural community could be educated to establish photographs of canines by sifting by way of a lot of photographs, making a guess about whether or not the picture is of a canine, seeing how far off it’s after which adjusting its weights and biases till they’re nearer to actuality.

Standard AI makes use of neural networks to resolve issues, however these networks are sometimes composed of huge numbers of similar synthetic neurons. The quantity and energy of connections between these similar neurons could change because it learns, however as soon as the community is optimized, these static neurons are the community.

Ditto’s crew, then again, gave its AI the flexibility to decide on the quantity, form and connection energy between neurons in its neural community, creating sub-networks of various neuron varieties and connection strengths inside the community because it learns.

“Our actual brains have a couple of kind of neuron,” Ditto says. “So we gave our AI the flexibility to look inward and resolve whether or not it wanted to switch the composition of its neural community. Primarily, we gave it the management knob for its personal mind. So it will probably remedy the issue, have a look at the consequence, and alter the sort and combination of synthetic neurons till it finds essentially the most advantageous one. It is meta-learning for AI.

“Our AI might additionally resolve between numerous or homogenous neurons,” Ditto says. “And we discovered that in each occasion the AI selected variety as a solution to strengthen its efficiency.”

The crew examined the AI’s accuracy by asking it to carry out a regular numerical classifying train, and noticed that its accuracy elevated because the variety of neurons and neuronal variety elevated. A regular, homogenous AI might establish the numbers with 57% accuracy, whereas the meta-learning, numerous AI was capable of attain 70% accuracy.

In accordance with Ditto, the diversity-based AI is as much as 10 occasions extra correct than standard AI in fixing extra difficult issues, reminiscent of predicting a pendulum’s swing or the movement of galaxies.

“We’ve proven that in case you give an AI the flexibility to look inward and study the way it learns it can change its inside construction — the construction of its synthetic neurons — to embrace variety and enhance its skill to study and remedy issues effectively and extra precisely,” Ditto says. “Certainly, we additionally noticed that as the issues turn into extra advanced and chaotic the efficiency improves much more dramatically over an AI that doesn’t embrace variety.”

The analysis seems in Scientific Experiences, and was supported by the Workplace of Naval Analysis (underneath grant N00014-16-1-3066) and by United Therapeutics. John Lindner, emeritus professor of physics on the School of Wooster and visiting professor at NAIL, is co-corresponding creator. Former NC State graduate scholar Anshul Choudhary is first creator. NC State graduate scholar Anil Radhakrishnan and Sudeshna Sinha, professor of physics on the Indian Institute of Science Training and Analysis Mohali, additionally contributed to the work.

[ad_2]

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 ksnmedia All Rights Reserved